Purpose of the study is to examine the roles of ASNIKOM in preparing coffee farmers to be included in the chain schemed by This Side Up. Qualitative approach was used to identify problems faced by coffee farmers. For this purpose, in depth interview and FGD as well were used to collect information. Interview questions were made in structured and flexible ways. FGD was organized to focus on critical issues related to structural problems. Literature review was concentrated on structural problems and related concepts such as convertabilty, functionality of structure, knowledges and structuration. Field Schooling is an essential part of active approach to change ways of farming and processing produces for better quality. Findings: structural problems defined by farmers themselves in their own words. Most of them were related to the structural problems identified by Neilson and Schoone. Only about 5% of the problems have been solved through the use of active approach. Conclusions: ASNIKOM has become a mediating structure connecting farmers and consumers through the use of Field Schooling approach. Recommendations: Actors having played in quality improvement need to be included in policy and program developments. Collaboration between ASNIKOM and This Side Up in regenerating Robusta coffee need to be considered for policy development.
| Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 12, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20231204.12 |
| Page(s) | 152-160 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
ASNIKOM, Rikolto, Catholic Local Churche, This Side Up, Manggarai
| [1] | Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of capital. Greenwood, Newyork: In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Eds., J. Richardson. |
| [2] | Coleman, J. S. (2003). Social capital in the creation of human capital. Networks in the Knowledge Economy. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780195159509.003.0007. |
| [3] | Giddens, A. (2006). Sociology. Polity. |
| [4] | Neilson, J. (2008). Global private regulation and value-chain restructuring in Indonesian smallholder coffee systems. World Development, 36 (9), 1607-1622. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.09.005. |
| [5] | Neilson, J., Arifin, B., Fujita, Y., & Hartati, D. F. (2010). Quality Upgrading in Specialty Coffee Chains and Smallholder Livelihoods in Eastern Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges. https://ei-ado.aciar.gov.au/supplementary-reports/annotated-bibliography/quality-upgrading-specialty-coffee-chains-and.html. |
| [6] | Neilson, J., Hartati, D. S., & Lagerq, Y. F. (2013). Coffee-based livelihoods in Flores, Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301226299_Coffee-based_livelihoods_in_Flores_Indonesia |
| [7] | Neilson, J. (2013). The Value Chain For Indonesian Coffee In A Green Economy. Buletin RISTRI, 4 (3), 183-198. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/133372-EN-the-value-chain-for-indonesian-coffee-in.pdf |
| [8] | Rikolto. (2017). 'Penampilan terakhir' VECO Di ajang perdagangan terbesar Indonesia. Retrieved from https://indonesia.rikolto.org/id/berita/penampilan-terakhir-veco-di-ajang-perdagangan-terbesar-indonesia |
| [9] | Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Simon & Schuster. |
| [10] | Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis. IDS WORKING PAPER 72. Retrieved from https://www.ids.ac.uk/publications/sustainable-rural-livelihoods-a-framework-for-analysis/ |
| [11] | Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Abrol, D., Atela, J., Charli-Joseph, L., Eakin, H., … Yang, L. (2020). Transformations to sustainability: Combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.004. |
| [12] | Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday & Company, New York. |
| [13] | McCarthy, E. D. (1996) Knowledge as Culture: Te NewSociology of Knowledge, Routledge, New York. |
| [14] | DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 |
| [15] | BPS (2020). Kabupaten Manggarai dalam Angka 2019. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Manggarai. |
| [16] | BPS (2019). Kabupaten Manggarai dalam Angka 2018. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Manggarai. |
APA Style
Robert Markus Zaka Lawang, Adristi Freedlina Ardine, Bunga Pertiwi Tontowi Puteri, Yosef Hilarius Timu Pera, Sukarno, et al. (2023). Field Schooling by ASNIKOM: Bridging the Structural Gap. Social Sciences, 12(4), 152-160. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20231204.12
ACS Style
Robert Markus Zaka Lawang; Adristi Freedlina Ardine; Bunga Pertiwi Tontowi Puteri; Yosef Hilarius Timu Pera; Sukarno, et al. Field Schooling by ASNIKOM: Bridging the Structural Gap. Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(4), 152-160. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20231204.12
AMA Style
Robert Markus Zaka Lawang, Adristi Freedlina Ardine, Bunga Pertiwi Tontowi Puteri, Yosef Hilarius Timu Pera, Sukarno, et al. Field Schooling by ASNIKOM: Bridging the Structural Gap. Soc Sci. 2023;12(4):152-160. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20231204.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ss.20231204.12,
author = {Robert Markus Zaka Lawang and Adristi Freedlina Ardine and Bunga Pertiwi Tontowi Puteri and Yosef Hilarius Timu Pera and Sukarno and Nur Leila Meilani and Flores George Mayaut and Terserah Luahambowo and Maksimus Regus and Rahmalia Rifandini},
title = {Field Schooling by ASNIKOM: Bridging the Structural Gap},
journal = {Social Sciences},
volume = {12},
number = {4},
pages = {152-160},
doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20231204.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20231204.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20231204.12},
abstract = {Purpose of the study is to examine the roles of ASNIKOM in preparing coffee farmers to be included in the chain schemed by This Side Up. Qualitative approach was used to identify problems faced by coffee farmers. For this purpose, in depth interview and FGD as well were used to collect information. Interview questions were made in structured and flexible ways. FGD was organized to focus on critical issues related to structural problems. Literature review was concentrated on structural problems and related concepts such as convertabilty, functionality of structure, knowledges and structuration. Field Schooling is an essential part of active approach to change ways of farming and processing produces for better quality. Findings: structural problems defined by farmers themselves in their own words. Most of them were related to the structural problems identified by Neilson and Schoone. Only about 5% of the problems have been solved through the use of active approach. Conclusions: ASNIKOM has become a mediating structure connecting farmers and consumers through the use of Field Schooling approach. Recommendations: Actors having played in quality improvement need to be included in policy and program developments. Collaboration between ASNIKOM and This Side Up in regenerating Robusta coffee need to be considered for policy development.},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Field Schooling by ASNIKOM: Bridging the Structural Gap AU - Robert Markus Zaka Lawang AU - Adristi Freedlina Ardine AU - Bunga Pertiwi Tontowi Puteri AU - Yosef Hilarius Timu Pera AU - Sukarno AU - Nur Leila Meilani AU - Flores George Mayaut AU - Terserah Luahambowo AU - Maksimus Regus AU - Rahmalia Rifandini Y1 - 2023/07/06 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20231204.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20231204.12 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 152 EP - 160 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20231204.12 AB - Purpose of the study is to examine the roles of ASNIKOM in preparing coffee farmers to be included in the chain schemed by This Side Up. Qualitative approach was used to identify problems faced by coffee farmers. For this purpose, in depth interview and FGD as well were used to collect information. Interview questions were made in structured and flexible ways. FGD was organized to focus on critical issues related to structural problems. Literature review was concentrated on structural problems and related concepts such as convertabilty, functionality of structure, knowledges and structuration. Field Schooling is an essential part of active approach to change ways of farming and processing produces for better quality. Findings: structural problems defined by farmers themselves in their own words. Most of them were related to the structural problems identified by Neilson and Schoone. Only about 5% of the problems have been solved through the use of active approach. Conclusions: ASNIKOM has become a mediating structure connecting farmers and consumers through the use of Field Schooling approach. Recommendations: Actors having played in quality improvement need to be included in policy and program developments. Collaboration between ASNIKOM and This Side Up in regenerating Robusta coffee need to be considered for policy development. VL - 12 IS - 4 ER -
Email: